Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2021 (5) TMI 778

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y ought to have considered the situation as exceptional circumstances for the reason of prevailing pandemic in the country and the CIRP process was still at nascent stage. It is an admitted fact that only 3 meetings have been convened from the date of commencement of CIRP till August, 2020. However, an Application is filed for replacing the RP. From the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Essar Steel India Ltd. Vs. Satish Kumar Ors. [ 2019 (11) TMI 731 - SUPREME COURT ] that the Adjudicating Authority and/or this Tribunal may extend time beyond 330 days in exceptional cases. The Appellant had shown the exceptional circumstances one is the imposition of lockdown and pendency of the judicial proceedings before the Adjudicating A .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... wn imposed by the Government of India and State Government and time consumed due to pendency of I.A. 4208 of 2020. 2. The Learned Counsel submitted that the Hon'ble Adjudicating Authority considered to exclude 97 days period from 25.03.2020 to 30.6.2020 on the ground of lockdown imposed by the Central Government as well as State Government instead of 160 days. Further, the Hon'ble Adjudicating Authority rejected the exclusion of time which was consumed due to pendency of I.A. The Learned Counsel submitted that as per Section 12(3) of the IBC 330 days time is fixed by the Code for the purpose of completion of CIRP process. However, the Learned Counsel submitted that in view of lockdown total 160 days has been lost and a period of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and this Tribunal in support of his case. 6. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Appellant. The Learned Adjudicating Authority vide its order dated 17.03.2021 excluded 97 days on account of lockdown taking into consideration the period from 25.03.2020 to 30.06.2020 instead of 25.03.2020 to 31.08.2020 as prayed by the Applicant while calculating the total period of CIRP. However, the Learned Adjudicating Authority rejected the exclusion of time consumed in judicial intervention for the purpose of calculating total CIRP period. From the perusal of paragraph 10 of the impugned order the Learned Adjudicating Authority observed as under: Here, we observe that the Applicant has not claimed the exten .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ly Covid -19 and due to the said pandemic the whole nation suffered and regular activities have come to a stand still. The Learned Adjudicating Authority ought to have considered the situation as exceptional circumstances for the reason of prevailing pandemic in the country and the CIRP process was still at nascent stage. It is an admitted fact that only 3 meetings have been convened from the date of commencement of CIRP till August, 2020. However, an Application is filed for replacing the RP. The said Application was pending for consideration before the Learned Adjudicating Authority and the same was disposed of on 27.01.2021. From the facts it is more relevant that the new RP has to commence the CIRP where it was left by his predecessor. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ngs before the Adjudicating Authority. Apart from the above, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a number of cases clearly held that the liquidation is the last resort. In the present case as discussed above the CIRP is at nascent stage and the Resolution Professional has to take forward duly complied with the procedure as prescribed under the Code for the purpose of Resolution of the Corporate Debtor instead of pushing the Corporate Debtor into liquidation. This Tribunal in suo moto Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 01 of 2020 dated 31.03.2020 excluded the period of lockdown ordered by the Central Government and State Government including the period as may be extended either in whole or part of the Country, where the registered Office of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates