2018 (5) TMI 2088

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ent(S) No. 1, 2, 3, 4 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. Petitioner has challenged the action of the respondents in attaching the petitioner's bank accounts in following factual background. 2. The petitioners are registered dealers engaged in providing various construction and engineering related services. For the financial year 201314, the Assessing Authority passe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the present case, we notice that there was no extraordinary reasons why the respondents had to take such drastic measures of attaching the bank account even before statutory period of limitation for filing appeal against assessment order was over. From the record, we notice that the issue arising in the present assessment is a repetitive one. In the earlier years, such questions having been decid .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t having been satisfied. Pending such appeal, there shall be stay against further recovery arising out of the order of assessment challenged in the appeal. III. The petitioner shall file an undertaking latest by 11.05.2018 of the responsible officer of the petitioner no.1company that the requirement of pre deposit shall be satisfied as provided above. IV. The attachment of the petitioner's b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X