Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2021 (11) TMI 680

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....icable to intangible assets. a). Whether the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in holding that the software in question is covered in Item No. 5 in Part A "Tangible Assets" under the head "Machinery and Plant" in the Appendix under Rule 5, failing to appreciate that expression "computer including computer software" in the said Item implicitly refers to the systems software which runs the computer and is an integral part of computer itself as a "Tangible Asset" and that the payments for right to use specialized software applications constitute an "Intangible Assets" in Part B, being in the nature of license on which depreciation @ 25% only is admissible. b) Whether the Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the asset in question i.e. payment for ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 6. Ld. Sr. DR vehemently argued that Ld. CIT(A) was not justified in allowing the claim of depreciation @ 60% as the software was customized and could be used without the operation of computer. He contended that such software would fall within the category of intangible assets. Therefore, the depreciation of such assets is allowable @ 25% only. 7. On the contrary, Ld. Counsel for the assessee opposed these submissions and supported the order of Ld. CIT(A). He submitted that the issue is no more res integra. The issue has already been decided in catena of judgments in favour of the assessee by allowing the depreciation @ 60%. He submitted that under the identical facts, the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT vs. Computer Ag....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dabad, ITAT V. TNS India Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2015)(69 SOT 22), Hyderabad ITAT VI. Amway India Enterprises Vs. DCIT, 111 ITD 112, Delhi ITAT. VII. Deepak Fertilizers & Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd. vs. DCIT (ITA Nos. 4904 & 5027/Mum/2009) 6.1. I have carefully gone through the finding of the AO, submission of the appellant and the case laws. Ld. AR has relied upon decision of IT AT Delhi in the case of M/s. Amway India Enterprises (supra) in which ITAT has allowed depreciation on software @ 60%. Respectfully following the decision of ITAT Delhi. it is held that depreciation @ 60% is allowable in the case of software. In view of this the appeal of the appellant is allowed." 9. Further, Ld. Counsel for the assessee has placed reliance on t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rule of interpretation, we find that the relevant entry under old appendix I Clause III (5) states computers including computer software and the Notes under the Appendix defines 'computer software' in Clause 7 to mean any computer program recorded on disc, tape, perforated media or other information storage http://www.judis.nic.in device. Noteworthy to mention that the notes contained in the appendix, the term 'computer' has not been defined. Therefore, as pointed out by the Division Bench in Bimetal Bearings Ltd. (supra), if a particular article would fall within the description by the force of words used, it is impermissible to ignore the word description. Thus, going by the usage of the equipment purchased by the petition....