9911796707
Advanced Search 
TMI Blog2021 (12) TMI 951X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Purohit JUDGMENT Per Hon'ble Jain, J. By way of the present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 09.1.2019 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur, Bench Jodhpur (hereinafter referred to as the 'CAT'), in miscellaneous application No. 290/00169/2018, whereby the miscellaneous applicat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e petitioner that the petitioner after lapse of one year on 22.10.2013 filed a representation and thereafter on 14.9.2017, the petitioner preferred a contempt petition before the CAT under Section 17 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 but the same was dismissed vide order dated 14.9.2017. On 12.12.2017, the petitioner filed a review application but the same also came to be dismissed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... duties. He was never denied to resume his duties by the respondents. The claim of the petitioner is that when similarly situated persons in compliance of the order dated 29.10.2012 were permitted to join the office, denial of indulgence to him in joining duties is discriminatory, illegal and unwarranted specifically when the order passed by the learned Tribunal was in his favor and the SLP filed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... file any execution application or raise any grievance. Merely on 22.10.2013 a letter was filed which was neither pursued nor any attempt to join was made. It was only in the year 2018 that the petitioner has again re-agitated the issue contrary to provisions of Section 21 and 27 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 which has set out limitation, qua execution and raising grievance against any c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
