TMI Blog2021 (12) TMI 951X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t petition in the year 2017. Not only that, the Tribunal has specifically stated that the conduct of the petitioner does not entitle him for grant of prayer requested by him on account of the fact that he never showed any willingness to resume duties in the office of respondent which is reflected from the fact that inspite of passing of favorable order by learned CAT on 29.10.2012, he has never appeared at the office nor did he file any execution application or raise any grievance. The act of petitioner in approaching the Tribunal after six years is time barred as per the provisions of Section 21 and 27 of Act of 1985. The application filed by the petitioner before the Tribunal was rightly dismissed and not entertained. - D.B. Ci ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on 14.9.2017, the petitioner preferred a contempt petition before the CAT under Section 17 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 but the same was dismissed vide order dated 14.9.2017. On 12.12.2017, the petitioner filed a review application but the same also came to be dismissed by circulation. Again on the same set of cause of action, the petitioner filed a miscellaneous application numbering 290/169/2018, 290/170/2018 for execution of the order dated 29.10.2012 in the year 2018 along with the application for condonation of delay and it was prayed before the Tribunal to direct the respondents to reengage the petitioner as a casual employee. It is important to submit that the said action was taken by the petitioner in t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 10.2012, he has never appeared at the office nor did he file any execution application or raise any grievance. Merely on 22.10.2013 a letter was filed which was neither pursued nor any attempt to join was made. It was only in the year 2018 that the petitioner has again re-agitated the issue contrary to provisions of Section 21 and 27 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 which has set out limitation, qua execution and raising grievance against any cause, order etc. The act of petitioner in approaching the Tribunal after six years is time barred as per the provisions of Section 21 and 27 of Act of 1985. On an overall consideration of the reasoning given by the learned Tribunal and the legal provisions and the facts of the case, we are ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
