Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1981 (3) TMI 9

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t wealth if the loan taken was used for a purpose which was not exempt from wealth-tax ? " For the assessment year 1974-75, assessment was completed on a net wealth of Rs. 96,000. On going through the records, the WTO found that the assessee had claimed a deduction in the original assessment in respect of a loan amounting to Rs. 35,005 taken from the Life Insurance Corporation of India on the security of his LIC policies under s. 2(m)(ii) of the W.T. Act. The WTO was of the opinion that no deduction from the total wealth was admissible in respect of the loan secured on the insurance policies which were exempted assets. Notice under s. 17(b) of the W.T. Act was issued and in response thereto the assessee filed return of wealth showing the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... under: " 2. (e) 'Assets' includes property of every description, movable or immovable, but does not include..." Section 2(e) mentions the properties which are not included in the definition of asset. We need not reproduce all the items which are excluded from the definition of assets in s. 2(e) of the Act because it is not necessary for our purposes to do so. Section 5 describes various assets which are exempted from payment of wealth-tax and which, according to this provision, shall not be included in the net wealth of the assessee. Clause (vi) of s. 5 exempts the right or interest of the assessee in any policy of insurance before the moneys covered by the policies become due and payable to the assessee. A plain reading of s. 2(m)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....had no jurisdiction to continue the enquiry and find out the destination of the debt or the loan. The question referred to us, therefore, has to be decided without reference to the fact whether the loan was used for a purpose which was not exempt from wealth-tax or for a purpose which was so exempt. Learned counsel for the assessee vehemently contended that cl. (ii) of s. 2(m) refers to such debts only which are secured on any property not chargeable under this Act. According to the learned counsel the right or interest of the assessee's insurance policy was not such an asset because it was chargeable under the Act, though, under s. 5, it was exempted from payment of wealth-tax. Counsel thus suggested that there was a distinction between ....