2010 (10) TMI 1235

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt : SRI. S. ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM), SRI.K.S.HARIHARAN NAIR, SRI. K. UMAMAHESWAR For the Respondent : R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.K. GOVINDAN JUDGMENT Ext.P1 is the order of assessment issued against the petitioner under Section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act), with respect to the assessment year 2005-06. Aggrieved by Ext.P1, the petitioner had preferred ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ejected the rectification petition holding that there is no defect which need rectification. Petitioner is challenging Ext.P8 in this writ petition. 3. On a perusal of Ext.P8 it is evident that the order does not contain any indication regarding proper consideration of the mater. It is stated in Ext.P8 that the defect pointed out in the application is not coming within the purview of Section 66 o....