TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2021 (12) TMI 1336
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ainst the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, (in short referred to as CIT(A) dated 10.08.2021 relating to A.Y. 2019-20, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act,1961(hereinafter referred to as "Act"). 2. The solitary issue in the present appeal relates to the addition made to the income of the assessee in the intimation made u/s 143(1) o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....PF was to be paid by due date specified in their respective Acts for the purpose of claiming deduction thereof. The Ld. CIT(A) held that the said amendment to be clarificatory and hence retrospective in application. Accordingly, the contention of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that the issue already stood decided in its favour by the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. M....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....parties. It is not denied that the employees contribution to ESI and PF was allowable and claimed as deduction by the assessee on the strength of various decisions of the jurisdictional High Court holding contributions deposited by the due date of filing of return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act as allowable. The Revenue has disallowed the same in the impugned year by applying the amendment made b....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....trength of the amendment effected by Finance Act 2021 to section 36(l)(va)/43B of the Act. Moreover it is an admitted position that the jurisdictional High Court has in various decisions held that employees contribution to ESI & PF is allowable if paid by the due date of filing return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act. The jurisdictional High Court has held so in the following cases: 1) CIT Vs. N....