Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2008 (8) TMI 29

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... [Order]. - Leave granted. 2. A notice was issued by the Collector of Central Excise, Raipur on 18-2-1992 to show cause as to why excise duty of Rs. 5,10,271/- should not be recovered from the company. On a reply having been filed by the company, the Collector, vide order dated 1-7-1992, confirmed the duty and also imposed penalty of Rs. 2.5 lac upon the company. 3. Against the order of the Coll....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....et aside the order-in-original passed by the Collector and remanded the matter to the Collector for re-adjudication. 5. In the meantime, appellants in these appeals filed Misc. Criminal Case No. 3048 of 2005 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the High Court of M.P. at Jabalpur for quashing Criminal Complaint No. 966 of 2000. The High Court, by the impugned order dated 22-8-200....