TMI Blog2023 (1) TMI 985X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... was paid subsequently by the two contractors - HELD THAT:- It is clear that the petitioner has not committed any misconduct and no action can be taken against him in view of the fact that the assessment orders passed against the contractors have been once again quashed by an independent assessment made by another Assessing Officer. This Court will not interfere with a charge memo but no usefu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Vasanthamala Government Advocate ORDER The petitioner has challenged the impugned charge memo dated 09.11.2019 issued to him on the following grounds: a) The respondents have not suffered any loss of revenue; b) The two contractors, for whom, assessment orders were passed by the petitioner in his official capacity as Assessing Officer on behalf of the respondents, have already paid ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 13.12.2022, this Court directed the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents to produce documentary evidence before this Court to show that the two contractors referred to supra are liable to pay tax more than the sums mentioned in the complaint given by the petitioner's predecessor to the police. 3. Today, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, on instr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ll be achieved if a direction is issued to the respondents to complete the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner, within a time frame as the evidence placed on record before this Court as well as the statement made by the respondents before this Court through the learned Government Advocate makes it clear that the petitioner cannot be held guilty for the alleged charge, in view ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
