2023 (1) TMI 985

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... P. Vijendran For the Respondents : Ms. K. Vasanthamala Government Advocate ORDER The petitioner has challenged the impugned charge memo dated 09.11.2019 issued to him on the following grounds: a) The respondents have not suffered any loss of revenue; b) The two contractors, for whom, assessment orders were passed by the petitioner in his official capacity as Assessing Officer on behalf of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e last hearing date, i.e. on 13.12.2022, this Court directed the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents to produce documentary evidence before this Court to show that the two contractors referred to supra are liable to pay tax more than the sums mentioned in the complaint given by the petitioner's predecessor to the police. 3. Today, learned Government Advocate appearing fo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... but no useful purpose will be achieved if a direction is issued to the respondents to complete the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner, within a time frame as the evidence placed on record before this Court as well as the statement made by the respondents before this Court through the learned Government Advocate makes it clear that the petitioner cannot be held guilty for th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X