2008 (7) TMI 176

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... It is a clear finding in the order of the appellate Commissioner that, from 1-3-1999, packaged tea was not a separate excisable commodity - This finding has not been challenged in the present appeal – hence revenue appeal is liable to be dismissed - E/452/2001 - 804/2008 - Dated:- 31-7-2008 - S/Shri P.G. Chacko, Member (J) and P. Karthikeyan, Member (T) Shri V.V. Hariharan, JCDR, for the A .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... was a different excisable commodity after 1-3-1999. It is a clear finding in the order of the appellate Commissioner that, from 1-3-1999, packaged tea was not a separate excisable commodity. This finding has not been challenged in the present appeal. 2. In the above circumstances, after hearing both sides and considering their submissions, we dismiss this appeal. (Dictated and pronounced in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X