2022 (1) TMI 1352

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... udhary, Sr. Adv., Mr. David Rao, Adv., Mr. M.S. Vishnu Sankar, Adv., Mr. Koshy John, Adv., Mr. Sanjeet Purohit, Adv., Mr. Sriram Parakkat, Adv., Ms. Athira G. Nair, Adv., Mr. Atul Sharma, Adv., Mr. Michael Rao, Adv., M/S Lawfic, AOR For the Respondent : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv., Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Adv., Ms. Hancy Maini, Adv., Mr. Ashutosh P. Shukla, Adv., M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR, M/S. K .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... been decided by the NCLAT vide impugned judgment. In our opinion, it was sufficient for the NCLAT to dispose of the appeal before it by restating the factual position noted while considering the Plan submitted for approval before the Committee of Creditors. In paragraph 48 of the impugned judgment, the NCLAT has noted thus: "... The name of the Appellant was mentioned in the list of Operational .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X