Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2002 (6) TMI 46

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Counsel, for the Respondent. [Order per: V.C. Daga, J. (Oral)]. - The petitioner has filed this petition claiming refund of the admitted amount on admitted facts. 2. The entitlement of the petitioner to claim refund is not in dispute. It is an admitted fact that the petitioner was allowed provisional clearance to clear goods on payment of duty, on the enhanced value. On 14th December, 1998, the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of India and claimed refund with interest thereon, at the rate of 24% per annum, from the date of payment till refund thereof. 4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in M/s. Goyal Fibres P. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors. (Writ Petition No. 4016 of 2001) (unreported) dated 11th January, 2002, to which one of us, (Daga, J.), is a party,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat the S.L.P. is pending before the Apex Court, especially when no interim relief has been obtained by them inspite of sufficient time which was available with them for obtaining appropriate interim relief. On the contrary, the learned Advocate General appearing for the petitioner, made a statement that when this matter was placed before the Apex Court for hearing in admission matters, the respon....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....merce and business. Such deprivation is bound to cause substantial prejudice to it. The petitioner, therefore, is justified in claiming interest for delayed payments. The Apex Court in the case of Life Insurance Corporation of India & Anr. v. Gangadhar Vishwanath Ranade (Dead) by L.Rs., AIR 1990 S.C. 185 ruled that such deprivation has to be compensated in terms of money by awarding interest at a ....