Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2008 (12) TMI 48

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mpany Secretary, for the Appellant. Mr. Sunil Kumar, DR, for the Respondent.  [Order per: P. K. Das, Member (Judicial)] (for the Bench): - The appellant filed this appeal against the order in Appeal No. 419/HKS(CE)JPR-II/2006 dated  10.7.2006 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Jaipur. 2. Relevant facts of the case in brief are that the appellant is providing services under the ca....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r it would be treated as commercial concern. He placed on record a decision of the Tribunal in the case of CCE, Jaipur vs. R.S. Financial Services [2008 (9) STR 231 (Tri-Del)] held that proprietary concern and proprietary synonymous and it would be treated as commercial concern.  In view of that learned counsel submits that the appellant had already deposited the entire amount of tax with int....