9911796707
Advanced Search 
TMI Blog2022 (7) TMI 1407X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... JAIN, J . 1. By way of present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing notice issued to the petitioner under Section 148A (b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') dated 09.03.2022 (Annexure P-1), order passed under Section 148A(d) dated 31.3.2022 along with notice under Section ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ide replies dated 15.03.2022 and that dated 16.3.2022. The explanation offered by the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 31.3.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) which was served upon the petitioner along with notice under Section 148 dated 31.3.2022 (Annexure P-2). The petitioner has approached this Court seeking writ of certiorari against the proceedings initiated under Section 148A(b) for t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ge of statutory duty casted upon him under Section 147 of the Act ?" 5. The aforesaid question already stands answered by this Court in CWP No.9142 of 2022 decided vide order dated 2.6.2022 titled as Gian Castings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and others holding that :- "12. Thus, the consistent view is that where the proceedings have not even been concluded by the statutory autho ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . Needless to mention that the aforesaid order was challenged in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 10762 of 2022 titled as 'Gian Castings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and others'. The Apex Court upheld the said order vide order dated 17.6.2022. 7. Faced with the situation, the petitioner relies upon the order passed in Civil Appeal No. 11189 of 2016 titled as Jeans Knit (P) L ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... remedies such as are provided by the Income-tax Act cannot always be a sufficient reason for refusing quick relief in a fit and proper case." 8. Admittedly in the present case the procedure as contemplated of the 1961 Act was followed and the authority acted within jurisdiction though petitioner alleges that it erred as the petitioner claims that the order passed under section 148A (d) warrants ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
