TMI Blog2015 (8) TMI 1570X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the respondents. The prosecution case was that the members of the petitioner were indulging in Mangatha ulle, velliye by betting money for profit. There is no allegation whatsoever that the members of the petitioner or other persons were playing rummy (13 cards) in the premises of the petitioner. Under the circumstances, petitioner says that since the prosecution was not based on the petitio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan, AOR, Mr. A. Radhakrishnan, AOR (Not Present), Mr. V. Balachandran, AOR For the Respondent : Mr. Rakesh ORDER SLP(C) No.15371/2012 (Mahalakshmi Cultural Assn. v. Dir. Inspector Gen. of Police Ors.) On 13th August, 2015, it was stated by learned counsel for the petitioner in SLP(C) No.15371/2012 that he has received telephonic instructions that the petitio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... based on the petitioner or any of its members playing rummy (13 cards), he would like to withdraw the writ petition that was filed before the Madras High Court being WP No.21620 of 2011. We permit him to withdraw the writ petition. Since the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, the observations made by the High Court in the writ petition or in the writ appeal filed by the State do not surv ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
