2009 (1) TMI 128
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....appeal is filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is clearly deficient as it does not disclose the substantial questions of law which arises from the impugned order requiring the consideration of this court. Nevertheless, we heard the learned counsel for the parties. Mr. R.V. Sinha, learned counsel for the appellant contended that the impugned judgment of the Tribunal was perverse,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ficers on very date when they visited the factory, as also, the fact that they had sufficient funds in the Cenvat credit and PLA for discharging the duty; was of opinion the matter called for a reduction in redemption fine, we see no reason to disagree. The Tribunal correctly exercised its discretion in the matter. 2. As regards the deletion of demand of Rs. 22,829/- on account of goods found sho....