Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2009 (8) TMI 21

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts. [Order Per S.S. Kang]. - Heard both sides. 2. The Appellant filed this Appeal against the impugned Order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), whereby he held that there is no discretion with the authorities to impose lesser penalty than the confirmed demand. The Commissioner (Appeals) relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dharmendra Textiles Processors vs. UOI r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ression on their part to evade payment of service tax. 3. Contention of the Revenue is that the Appellant had not paid the service tax on due dates and subsequently, paid the service tax along with the interest. Hence, they are liable to penalty. 4. I find that in the impugned Order, the Commissioner (Appeals) after relying on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dharmendra T....