Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1990 (3) TMI 384

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....igh, in particular on the eve of "Brahmotsavam". The temple is located on Tirumala Hills. There are four Mada Streets constituting four sides of a Square, called 'South Mada Street', 'East Mada Street', 'North Mada Street', and 'West Mada Street'. The temple proper abuts South Mada Street. Immediately to the rear of the temple and on its western side is, what is called "Theertha Katta Street". The four Mada Streets and the buildings and structures abutting on both sides thereof constitute the centre piece of the Temple Town. On certain festival occasions the deity of Sree Venkateswara is taken in procession along the streets, when thousands and thousands of people congregate there to have a glimpse of the deity. The Mada Streets around the temple are narrow and get congested on such occasions, in 1974 there was an unfortunate accident in which three persons were crushed under the wheels of temple-chariot. 3. Till the year 1933 the Mahants of Hatiramji Mutt were administering the affairs and looking after the properties of Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams. During their stewardship several people took properties on annual ground rent....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....D. dispensary up to Wood Lands Hotel, a proposal is suggested to construct a commercial centre in a platform type in the open space available in Seshadrinagar. These two proposals are suggested not only from the point of maintaining sacred environment around the temple complex but also with a view to take care of both the present and future commercial needs of the residents and pilgrims population in a rational way". paragraph 2 deals with matters like improvement of facilities viz., Canteens and Restaurants, Milk Booths, Kalyana Kattas, and Banking facilities. Paragraph 3 deals with other incidental matters, like water supply, Drainage and Sewerage, and Electricity, while paragraph 4 deals with Medical and Health facilities, Communications, Fire Services, Security arrangements, Religious Institutions, and Reception Centres. Paragraph 5 deals with Traffic and Transportation. This paragraph deals, inter alia, with widening of the Mada Streets and providing several other facilities. Paragraph 6 deals with housing accommodation, while paragraph 7 deals with Landscaping and Conservation. 6. Since the preparation of the said Master Plan, T.T.D. has been taking several steps tow....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d unbuilt up properties of private owners should be taken over by the T.T.D. by acquisition or otherwise with a view to draw up detailed re-development plans for those areas. After acquiring these properties the area bounded by Mada Streets all around the temple complex should be cleared off of all structures and developed as a semi-open space for the use of the pilgrims. The dilapidated structures on either side of the Mada Streets should be dismantled and structures of suitable architectural value be built such as halls for religious discourses and for other ancillary use connected with the temple. As an immediate measure it was suggested that encroachments and unauthorised structures abutting temple properties should be removed. Priorities have to be worked out in implementing these programmes and preference should be given to the short range programme which require minimum financial outlays". It is also stated that on account of the lie of the land of Tirumala Hills, the sewerage water and other polluted water is flowing towards the temple; that the water in the 'Pusharini' (Bathing Tank) has become highly contaminated and has been posing a danger to the health of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llowing contentions are urged on behalf of the counsel for the appellants :-- (i) One of the main purposes behind the acquisition, viz., implementation of the Master Plan, is not mentioned in the several notifications concerned herein. Moreover, "implementation of Master Plan" is a vague expression which does not enable the persons interested to submit their precise objections. It is only where the particular purpose for which a particular piece of land is being acquired, is specified in the notification that the person concerned can submit his objections properly and effectively. Indeed, in several cases where implementation of the Master Plan was stated to be one of the public purposes behind acquisition, the petitioners expressly asked the Land Acquisition Officer to supply them with a copy of the Master Plan so as to enable them to submit their objections properly; but, neither the copy of Master Plan as supplied to them, nor were they given an opportunity of submitting their objections thereto. In some notifications several purposes are lumped together. For example, in the notification concerned in W.A. No. 1363/89 (arising from W.P, No. 8759/88), three purposes are....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the learned single Judge. In particular, it is pointed out that where the acquisition relates to a large extent and involves individual properties of a large number of owners, it is not practicable to mention the public purpose with respect to each piece of land separately, or specifically. It is submitted that according to the title deeds recognised by the British India Government, the entire Tirumala Hills is the property of T.T.D. No piece of land was owned by private persons there. But, in course of management by H. R. Mutt, several private owners got into possession of various pieces of land, upon which they made some constructions and are now claiming title by adverse possession. With a view to obviate prolonged litigation the T.T.D. decided not to challenge their claim in a Civil Court, but to initiate proceedings for acquisition. Even by G.O.Ms. No. 1784, dated 4-11-1965, T.T.D. has been permitted to "acquire the lands owned by private persons for maintaining the sanctity of the temple, and for purposes incidental thereto. The ever increasing pilgrim-traffic to Tirumala calls for a planned and integrated development of the entire Tirumala area, and in particular the ar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., and then alone it should issue notifications. According to them, unless this is done, the affected, owners of plots will not be in a position to submit their objections to the acquisition in a proper and effective manner. It is not enough, they say to mention a general purpose, viz., implementation of Master Plan, or construction of Kalyana Mantapam, or Choultries. Such a general description of the public purpose does not enable the affected owners -- say the petitioners -- to submit their objections properly. In such a case it must be said, they say, that no proper opportunity has been afforded to the individual owners to submit their objections which vitiates the entire acquisition. We are unable to agree. The purpose stated in the impugned notifications viz., implementation of Master Plan, or construction of Kalyana Mantapam, or Choultries, as the case may be, is undoubtedly a public purpose. It is not denied by the petitioners that a large volume of pilgrim-traffic visits Tirumala Town every day, and visits the temple. It is not also disputed that on certain days the traffic runs into tens of thousands. All this pilgrim-traffic has to be housed, fed, and provided reasonable o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ot of land. Suffice it to refer in this connection to two decisions of the Supreme Court. 12. In Aflatoon v. Lt. Governor, Delhi, [1975]1SCR802 it is held by the Supreme Court that acquisition of land for planned development of Delhi even before the enactment of the Delhi Development Act, is not impermissible. The following observations bring out the principle : "The planned development of Delhi had been decided upon by the Government before 1959, viz., even before the Delhi Development Act came into force. It is true that there could be no planned development of Delhi except in accordance with the provisions of Delhi Development Act after that Act came into force, but there was no inhibition in acquiring land for planned development of Delhi, under the Act before the Master Plan was ready (see the decision in Patna Improvement Trust v. Smt. Lakshmi Devi, AIR1963SC1077 ). In other words, the fact that actual development is permissible in an area other than a development area with the approval or sanction of the local authority did not preclude the Central Government from acquiring the land for planned development under the Act. Section 12 is concerned only with the planned d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e purposes mentioned in the various notifications. For the sake of convenience, we shall refer to, and deal with, them with reference to each Mada Street: -- Plots of land on both sides of North Mada Street are sought to be acquired. There are as many as 22 notifications. It would be convenient to consider these notifications in two separate categories. In the first category are 12 notifications, concerned in Writ Appeals Nos. 1355, 1847, 1373, 1364, 1374,1349, 1369, 1356, 1351, 1614 and 1363 of 1989, as well as the plot concerned in W. P. No. 8551/88. In the second category are the plots concerned in Writ Appeals Nos. 1360, 1352, 1367, 1371, 1362 and 1357 of 1989, as well as the plots concerned in W.P. Nos. 10130, 10150, 16335 and 9622 of 1988. All the plots concerned in the second category are in the area, called. "Pullareddi Thota". Coming to the first category of notifications, in eight notifications (concerned in Writ Appeals Nos. 1847, 1373, 1364, 1374, 1349, 1356 and 1351 of 1989, and W.P. No. 8551/88), the purpose mentioned is "widening the road and construction of Kalyana Mantapam". In some of the notifications an additional purpose is mentioned, viz.,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uisitions are only on one side of it, There are as many as 13 notifications, relating to 13 pieces of land. To the rear of the plots proposed to be acquired, there is "Ram Bagicha Garden". It is in this garden that a fairly large Choultry is proposed to be built. In all the notifications relating to the lands abutting East Mada Street the purpose mentioned is "Construction of Fourth Choultry", or "Construction of Choultry and to implement Master Plan", as the case may be. It is pointed out by the counsel for the appellants (petitioners) that some Guest-Houses have already been constructed in "Ram Bagicha Garden", and further that the Fourth Choultry also has already been constructed, and inaugurated in January 1987. So far as the construction of Guest-Houses is concerned, their construction does not preclude the T.T.D. from constructing a big Choultry to meet the ever increasing pilgrim-traffic. With respect to the averment that Fourth Choultry has already been constructed and inaugurated, no material was placed either before the Land Acquisition Officer in the enquiry under Section 5-A, or in Writ Appeals Nos. 1384 and 1385 of 1989 (wherein ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng Vasant Mantapam and widening the road in West Mada Street, and to implement Master Plan". For the reasons mentioned in the preceding paragraphs, we hold that the purposes mentioned in this behalf are equally public purposes, and are specific enough to enable the persons interested to submit their objections. 18. A few notifications, i.e., four in number, pertain to plots abutting "Theertha Katta Street". In all these notifications, the purpose mentioned is "widening the road", and in two of the notifications a further purpose, viz., "construction of Kalyana Mantapam", is added. The reasons assigned by us hereinabove for holding that the purpose is a public purpose and that it is specific enough to enable the persons interested to submit their objections, apply equally in respect of these notifications. 19. It is true that the effect of the impugned notifications is to eliminate all the private owners on both sides of four Mada Streets. All the plots of land, including buildings thereon owned by persons other than T.T.D., are being acquired for the purpose of T.T.D. But, can it be said that this purpose is impermissible in law, or that it indi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the purpose, viz., implementation of Master Plan, wherever mentioned, is a non-existent purpose. 21. It is then argued that in W.A. No. 1363/89 (arising from W.P. No. 8759/88), the persons interested not only filed objections to the acquisition on 29-7-1987 (in the enquiry under Sec. 5-A, but also filed a petition on 26-8-1987 to summon certain documents, including the Master Plan, and stating specifically that oral evidence will be led by the objectors only after those documents are produced. It is also brought to our notice that on receiving such application the Land Acquisition Officer addressed the T.T.D. authorities for supplying him with a copy of the Master Plan, but that the authorities told him that the Master Plan is already available with him. It is also pointed out that the Land Acquisition Officer neither sent any communication to the objectors in the said matter, nor did he supply a copy of the Master Plan. It is submitted that this amounts to denial of opportunity to the objectors to establish their case. On account of non-supply of documents asked for by, them, including the Master Plan, the objectors could not adduce oral evidence which they wanted to adduce, it ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....A. No. 1363/89 on the above ground. 22. In W.A. No. 1384/89 a separate contention is urged to the effect: In the notification published under S.4(1), the purpose of acquisition is stated to be "for widening West Theertha Katta Street and for construction of Kalyana Mantapams for public purposes and for convenience of the visiting pilgrims"; but in the counter affidavit filed by the T.T.D. the purpose of acquisition is stated to be "open spaces, construction of commercial complex and to prevent pollution". Further, in the additional counter of T.T.D. yet another purpose, totally different, is mentioned. In view of this contention we have sent for and looked into the original record produced before us by the learned Government Pleader. The purpose mentioned in the notification under S. 4 is "for widening West Theertha Katta Street and for construction of Kalyana Mantapams for public purpose and for convenience of the visiting pilgrims". In the declaration published under S. 6(1) of the Act, the purposes mentioned are identical. Evidently, the statements in the counter-affidavits are the result of some confusion. 23. It is then contended by the learned....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erned in this case is owned by a Mutt; that, the Mutt is run by 'Madhava Denomination', recognized as a religious denomination by the Supreme Court, and that the acquisition of its entire property disables it from carrying on its activities altogether. Art. 26 of the Constitution is relied upon as prohibiting such acquisition. Art. 26 reads as follows : "26. Freedom to manage religious affairs : Subject to public order, morality and health, every religious denomination or any section thereof shall have the right- (a) to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes; (b) to manage its own affairs in matters of religion; (c) to own and acquire movable and immovable property; and (d) to administer such property in accordance with law". The object underlying Art. 26 has been explained in several decisions. It is enough to refer to the decision in Narendra Prasadji v. State of Gujarat, [1975]2SCR317 . The following observations in the said judgment are relevant :-- "......Article 26 guarantees, inter alia, the right to own and acquire movable and immovable property for managing religious affairs. This right, however, cannot take....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat it invalidates the acquisition. Moreover, it is stated by the Devasthanams that all these religious institutions will be provided alternate sites, as far as possible, so as to permit them to carry on their activities. 29. We do not see any substance in the argument that since some of the properties proposed to be acquired are owned by Mutts or other religious institutions, and because some of them are also running Choultries, thus catering to the needs of pilgrim-traffic, they too are serving a public purpose and hence their properties cannot be acquired for serving another public purposes. No decision has been brought to our notice supporting the proposition that merely because a particular property is being used for serving a public purpose, it cannot be acquired compulsorily by the State for serving a public purpose. On the contrary, the Supreme Court has ruled in Abdul Hussain v. State of Gujarat, [1968]1SCR597 , following its earlier decision in Somawanti v. State of Punjab, [1963]2SCR774 , that land used for one purpose can be acquired for serving another public purpose. 30. Learned counsel for the respondents brought to our notice the decision of the Supreme Court in G....