2024 (5) TMI 402

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2.2022 which is the summary of the order passed against the petitioner under Section 74 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner has not enclosed the copy of the detailed order passed against the petitioner on the same day in GSTIN: 33DXVPK0032H1ZJ/2018-19 (DRC-07) in the affidavit filed along with this Writ Petition. A copy of the said detailed order has now been filed by the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent before this Court. 3. According to the petitioner, the petitioner had engaged an auditor who had filed a wrong return under Section 139 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by boosting the sales turnover as Rs. 3,77,37,307/- instead of Rs. 2,89,32,589/-. It is submitted that the petitioner was issued ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cording to the petitioner, he is now in penury and is working as an employee and has no means to pay the amount. 6. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent. 7. As per the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Assistant Commissioner (CT) LTU, Kakinadu and others Vs. Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Limited, 2020 SCC OnLine SC 440, this Writ Petition, at this distant point of time, is not maintainable. In any event, the fact remains that the petitioner has initiated proceedings for rectifying the returns filed under Section 139 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, the petitioner has not secured any order from....