TMI Blog2018 (8) TMI 2155X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Rony John and Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Satyakam, ASC, GNCTD with Mr. Shashwat Parihar, Advocate. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr. Kavindra Gill, Advocate for R-2/UOI. Mr. Amit Bansal and Mr. Akhil Kulshrestha, Advocates for R-3. ORDER 1. This Court had in a batch of writ petition, including W.P.(C) 3404/2015 'Sagar Ratna Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. vs. Value ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e the Supreme Court. 3. This Court is of the opinion that it would be appropriate to follow the judgment of 17.05.2017 because the issues are identical, however, in the event the final judgment is in any way set aside, modified or clarified by the Supreme Court in the pending proceedings before it, that decision will be binding upon the parties. In other words, if it becomes necessary, in some ma ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|