2020 (2) TMI 1722
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... is aggrieved that the learned CIT-A has erred in sustaining 12.5% disallowance on account of bogus purchases for A.Y. 2010-11 & 2011-12. 2. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is engaged in the business of building material supplier. Information was received from the sales tax Department that assessee has that in bogus purchases. The assessment was accordingly reopened. The assessing offic....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ndred percent disallowance for bogus purchase cannot be done. The rationale being no sales is possible without actual purchases. This proposition is supported from honourable jurisdictional High Court decision in the case of Nikunj Eximp Enterprises (in writ petition no 2860, order dt. 18.6.2014). In this case the honourable High Court has upheld hundred percent allowance for the purchases said to....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cted to be disallowed on account of bogus purchase. 5. Up on careful consideration I find considerable cogency in the submission of the learned counsel of the assessee, as otherwise it will be double jeopardy to the assessee. Accordingly I modify the order of learned CITA and direct that the disallowance in this case be restricted to 12.5% of the bogus purchases as reduced by the gross profit rat....