9911796707
Advanced Search 
TMI Blog2022 (3) TMI 1610X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ner, in another FIR No.259 dated 09.03.2019 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Chandni Bagh, Panipat. The operative part of the order reads as under: - "...The above said FIR was registered on written complaint sent by Excise Taxation Officer (State Tax), Ward-06, Panipat. In the complaint Excise Taxation Officer (State Tax) alleged that firm M/s Ganesh Trading Co. has shown sales in huge amount to different dealers of the State and passed undue input tax credit by making invoices without movement of goods and caused loss of revenue. Enquiries revealed that no firm by the said name existed at the address given. Summons were issued to Yogesh Sharma, Proprietor of the said firm who alleged that Janender Kumar Sisodia had ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ar Sawan, IPS, Superintendant of Police, Panipat has been filed in CRMM-35679-2020 titled as 'Gaurav Bansal Vs. State of Haryana'. Learned State Counsel has submitted that photostat copy of the same may be taken on record in the present case also. The request is allowed and photostat copy of the above said status report is ordered to be placed on record in the present case. In the status report it has been mentioned that a Special Investigation Team (SIT) under the supervision of Assistant Superintendent of Police, Samalkha Ms. Pooja Vashishth, IPS and consisting of Inspector-In-charge, Special Detective Unit, Panipat and SI Surender Singh was constituted to conduct the remaining investigation of the case. Co-accused Ravind ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ments are being made in the relevant provisions as well as in the software for preventing GST Input Tax Credit frauds. I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned State Counsel and gone through the relevant record. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was not named in the FIR and no allegation was made against the petitioner in the FIR even by reference. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case subsequently on statement of co-accused. Alleged recovery of the photocopies of identity proofs was planted on him. The same also does not show his involvement in commission of the alleged offences. The petitioner is neither the proprietor nor partner of the firm. The petitioner is a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al Magistrate First Class and also the fact that the trial is likely to take long time due to restrictions imposed to prevent spread of infection of Covid-19, but without commenting on the merits of the case, I am inclined to extend the concession of regular bail to the petitioner..." Learned counsel further submits that on similar set of allegations, four FIRs were registered against the petitioner and it is already noticed in the aforesaid order that he has already been granted regular bail in two cases as well as in FIR No.259. It is also submitted that the allegations in all the FIRs are that by using mobile phone of the complainant, his firm evaded the GST. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody for the las ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
