Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2024 (11) TMI 1125

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Since involve common issue, there are taken up together for hearing and disposal. 2. Appellants are engaged in the manufacture of medicaments falling under Chapter 30 of Central Excise Tariff Act, (CETA), 1985. They also manufacture medicament on loan licence basis on behalf of the M/s. Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (2) M/s. Biddle Sawyer Ltd. and (3) M/s. Micro Labs Ltd. During the relevant period from November 2011 to July 2012 and September 2012 to March 2013, they had availed cenvat credit of Rs.2,18,34,861/- and Rs.1,37,51,602/- against endorsed Bill of Entry by the importers i.e., loan licensors M/s. Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (2) M/s. Biddle Sawyer Ltd. and (3) M/s. Micro Labs Ltd. who supply the raw materials to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the materials have been received in their factory and duly utilised in the manufacture of finished goods, a fact never disputed by the department even though specifically averred by them in their reply to the show-cause notice and also before the adjudicating authority. 4. The learned Authorised Representative for the Revenue reiterated the findings of the learned Commissioner. 5. We find that the short issue involved for consideration is, whether the appellants are entitled to avail cenvat credit on endorsed Bill of Entry sent along with the materials by the principal manufactures M/s. Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (2) M/s. Biddle Sawyer Ltd. and (3) M/s. Micro Labs Ltd. on loan licensee basis. 6. We find that in appellant's ow....