Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1981 (5) TMI 28

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....round that the goods are classifiable under heading 29.01/45 (1) @ 60%+15% and not 100%+20% as held by the assessing authority. They were unsuccessful before the original authority and thereupon preferred an appeal before the Appellate Collector under section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appeal was also rejected vide reasonings given in the impugned order. 2. In the revision application, the petitioners have made the following pleadings : (1) That the polyethylene glycol 400 does not have the characteristics of artificial plastic material and is, accordingly, not at all covered by the entry in 39.01. According to them, the subject product is more particularly covered by the exclusion note given in and forming part of entry 39.01 (pa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dered all the aforesaid arguments and examined the records of the case. The Government observe that the petitioners, before the original authority as well as before the appellate forum, made a specific plea i.e. for reassessment of the impugned goods under item 29.01/45(1) and advanced various reasonings to justify such reassessment. However, before this revisionary authority they have asked for refund of countervailing duty paid. This obviously appears to be a mistake on the petitioners' part particularly so when no countervailing duty has at all been charged in the instant case. In view of the above, the Government of India reject the petitioners plea for refund of countervailing duty in limine and proceed to examine the case with referen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... glycol do not have the character of artificial resin or plastic material and, therefore, it should be excluded from the scope of entry 39.01/06, the Government observe that the wordings of Chapter 39.01 do not lead to a conclusion that in order to merit classification under it, it is essential that the product should necessarily have the character of artificial plastic material. In coming to this conclusion, the Government note that under chapter note 2 of chapter 39, it is stipulated that in heading 39.01/06 "condensation, polycondensation, polyaddition, polymerisation and copolymerisation products'' are to be taken to apply only to goods of a kind produced by chemical synthesis answering to one of the following description : (a) artific....