2025 (3) TMI 1257

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Saifi, Adv. Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, AOR For the Respondent : Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, A.S.G. Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv. Ms. Mani Munjal, Adv. Mr. Aadya Jha, Adv. Mr. Vaishnav Kirti Singh, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Lamba, AOR ORDER 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. 2. On 11th December, 2018, an application was filed under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 (for short, "t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant submitted that the NCLAT in the impugned judgment has taken an erroneous view that Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (for short, "the Limitation Act") cannot be applied for excluding the period spent for prosecuting the review petition. Her submission is that, in fact, while rejecting the review petition, the NCLT held that the review petition was not maintainable and, hence, the NCL....