2003 (4) TMI 116

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by wrongly stating that no similar petition was filed or had been dismissed. The writ petition before the High Court challenges the validity of Section 3A introduced in Central Excise Act, 1944. It is not in dispute that other petitions challenging the validity of the very same provision are pending before the High Court. In this matter, we are not going into the question of the effect of not chal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... A. We are not going into question of the effect of such a statement on behalf of the petitioners, on the writ petition which has been dismissed by the impugned order. 3. Under the aforesaid circumstances, we set aside the impugned judgment and remit CWP Nos. 1729, 1740, 1744-1745/2002 for decision thereof. These writ petitions would be heard by the High Court along with the other petitions pendin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X