2004 (9) TMI 124

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by this common order as they are arising out of the common order dated 26-3-2004 (Annexure-A) passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Regional Bench at Mumbai (for short "the Tribunal") in stay application Nos. E/S/2112 and 2113/03 filed in Appeal Nos. E/3067 & 3068/03. 2. At the outset, it may be stated that Mr. Nanavati, learned Counsel for the petitioners, in both .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Mr. Nanavati, learned Counsel for the petitioners that in both these petitions the impugned order passed by learned Tribunal is totally a non-speaking order, therefore, the impugned order is liable to be quashed and set aside. Having gone through the order passed by the learned Tribunal. Mr. Malkan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents was hardly in a position to defend the same. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... al with a request to decide both the stay applications by a brief reasoned order dealing with all the contentions raised by the petitioners in it. We are sure, that while deciding the stay applications afresh, the learned Tribunal may also keep in mind the fact that the petitioner had already deposited the entire amount of duty be failed to comply with the condition of depositing outstanding amoun .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X