Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2000 (11) TMI 227

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ef facts of the case is that the respondents are manufacturers of Bubble Gum and chewing gum with their own brand name and also under the brand name owned by one M/s. Gum (India) Ltd., Madras who are not eligible for the benefit of concession under Notification No. 175/86-C.E., dated 1-3-1986. The issue involved is whether in computing the value of clearances for the purpose of availing the conces....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he issue as per law. 3. We have heard ld. DR Shri Sudarsan for the department who reiterates the grounds in appeal and submits that the clearances whether of eligible brand name or not eligible brand names in the notification cannot be differentiated and have to be totalled up as first clearance to determine the value slabs and the grounds taken in the Commissioner's E.A. 3 application should ind....