Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1983 (8) TMI 87

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assessee is engaged in manufacture of artificial silk fabrics. The assessee had an industrial unit which was used for spinning and weaving. Till Unit No.2 was commissioned, bleaching, dyeing & printing work was being done by outsiders. In the assessment year relevant to the accounting year ended 30th June, 1976, the assessee established a Unit in which the work done by outsiders was done by the as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....xistence. 2. Apart from these three reasons, the ITO also held that even if the assessee was entitled to the deduction, only the net value of the assets could be considered as capital employed. 3. The CIT(A) held that the assessee was eligible for the deduction. 4. We are of opinion that the CIT(A)'s order is correct. The first reason given by the ITO is that dyeing & printing cannot form a ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cturing unit. 5. The second reason given is based on the fact that an old building used by another undertaking is now part of the new unit. It is true that before the amendment in 1976, if the assessee had made use of any old building, the assessee would not be entitled to the deduction. But, w.e.f. 1st April, 1976, the second provision to s. 80J(4) has taken care of this situation. This proviso....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n from the second year onwards The ITO was aware of this decision. He had tried to distinguish it, but we do not find any distinguishing feature. We are of opinion that the Gujarat High Court Decision would apply and, therefore, the disability of the assessee stands removed. 6. The third reason given by the ITO arises from the common funds utilized. This point has been considered by the Tribunal....