Even it would not be proper to penalize the appellant under ...

Service Tax

December 28, 2013

Even it would not be proper to penalize the appellant under Sections 76 and 78, when the first appellate authority waived the penalty under Section 77 itself - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Even it would not be proper to penalize the appellant under ...

Service Tax

December 28, 2013

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - waiver of penalty u/s 80 - C&F Service - inclusion of reimbursements of expenses - there were divergent views on the issue - penalty waived - AT

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - provisions of Section 78 having been invoked and penalty imposed, Section 76 penalty may not be justified - AT

Finance Bill, 2015 - service tax - Substantial overall in levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78

Extended period was invoked, not for recovery of non-levied tax but, merely to impose penalties under section 76 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994. The finding of the first...

BOTH PENALTIES UNDER SECTION 76 & 78 CAN NOT BE LEVIED - Article

Penalty u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - No malafide can be attributed to the respondent, who is organized under Government of India - No penalty.

Levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - taxability of Sale of Space or Time for Advertisement - it is a case of bonafide mistake - no penalty - AT

Penalty u/s 76, 77, and 78 - service tax with interest deposited before issuance of show cause notice - import of services - Stay granted - AT

Penalty imposed u/s 76, 77 & 78 - renting of immovable property - case is squarely covered for non imposition of penalties under Section 80A - AT

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Quick Updates: