Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - when a unit has ...

Central Excise

June 18, 2014

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - when a unit has been closed in the year 2006 and there is no activity going on, if any payment is made in that account, the question of bar of unjust enrichment does not arise at all. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - when a unit has ...

Central Excise

June 18, 2014

You may also like:

Denial of refund claim - Finalization of provisional assessment - prior to the amendment i.e. 13-7-2006, this doctrine of unjust enrichment was not attracted to refund...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Denial of refund claim - unjust enrichment clause shall not apply for finalization of the provisional assessment for the cases prior to 13.7.2006 - AT

Denial of refund claim - unjust enrichment - There is no provision in the Central Excise law that the state government authorities would be are outside of the principles...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - When the provisions of Central Excise are not applicable in that case bar of unjust enrichment is also not applicable - AT

Refund claim - Provisional assessment - Unjust enrichment - claim of refund was not subjected to the condition which was brought in by way of amendment for the first...

Denial of refund of service tax - Unjust enrichment - appellant has not provided any service at all. - question of unjust enrichment does not arise - AT

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Onus to prove - service tax which has been recovered from the customer, who has taken cenvat credit of the said service tax...

Denial of Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - The Assistant Commissioner while dealing with the application for refund was not justified in sitting in judgment over the...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Security deposit - amount not to be credited to consumer welfare fund - appellants are eligible for refund of cash security...

Quick Updates: