Department failed to establish that Sale and lease back ...

Income Tax

July 20, 2011

Department failed to establish that Sale and lease back transaction was really a sham and dubious transaction and was a colourable device, depreciation allowed

View Source

← Previous Next →

Department failed to establish that Sale and lease back ...

Income Tax

July 20, 2011

You may also like:

Sale and a lease back transaction - the lease transactions were genuine and that the Department failed to adduce any evidence to prove that the transaction was not...

Sale and lease back transactions, no deduction of lease rental be allowed as sale of asset is paper transaction only – ITAT order reversed

Depreciation on sale and lease back contracts and lease contracts - number of transactions with different parties analyzed. - HC

Tax Planning versus Tax Avoidance - Finance Lease / Operating lease - No straight jacket formula can be adopted to say that every case of sale and lease back...

Addition u/s 68 – Genuineness of transaction in shares - genuine or sham and bogus – Revenue in failing to discharge the basic onus - inquiry was not carried forward -...

Long term capital loss on sale of shares - Just because of assessee sold shares to daughter and sister concern, it cannot be considered that the transactions are sham...

Addition u/s 68 as accommodation entries - long term capital gain on sale of shares as sham/bogus transaction - Mere suspicion cannot be a ground for treating the...

Claim of depreciation in respect of assets allegedly leased - financing transactions - assessee purchased assets and leased back to the same company claiming 100% depreciation - HC

Tax planning versus Tax Avoidance - distribution of dividend, prior to sale of its shares by the assessee, even though tax advantageous cannot be termed as a colourable...

Sale of shares - share broker - Revenue condemned the share transaction of the assessee and held them to sham merely because some share brokers were found to be indulged...

Quick Updates: