Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2016 Year 2016 This

Once the commission is accepted to have been paid, there is no ...

Income Tax

September 21, 2016

Once the commission is accepted to have been paid, there is no logic in disallowing such expenditure by holding that it was excessive. It is for the assessee to determine the way in which it has to carry on its business. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Disallowing of Peak load violation charges paid to PSEB - nature of expenditure - assessee failed to prove that the claim was not penal in nature - expenditure was...

  2. Disallowance u/s. 40(A)(2)(b) - excessive salary payment - payment to close associates / related parties - AO can disallow only that portion of the total expenditure,...

  3. Disallowance of expenditure u/s 37(1) - Amount paid as penalty for using electricity during restricted hours - the amount paid being penalty, the AO was justified in...

  4. Prior period expenditure - when prior period income is taxed prior period expenditure cannot be disallowed - AT

  5. Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(b) - for the purpose of disallowing a deduction, AO has to form an opinion not only that the expenditure is excessive or unreasonable, but that...

  6. Classification - Programmable Logic Controllers/Programmable Process Controllers and Automatic Data Processing Machines - classifiable under CETH 85.37 as programmable...

  7. Disallowance of non-compete fees - Capital or revenue expenditure - expenditure has to be disallowed as capital expenditure - however depreciation to be allowed - AT

  8. Disallowance of expenses when the business was not fully functional - - Nowhere in the order of the AO there is a whisper as to how the expenditure is excessive and how...

  9. IT - Sec. 40A(2) - increase in remuneration to Directors - when CLB had approved the remuneration it could not be said that the expenditure was excessive or unreasonable - AT

  10. Prior period expenditure cannot be disallowed simply by observing that it is not ascertainable whether this expenditure was incurred for earning a particular receipts...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates