Penalty u/s 11AC - Whether the appellant was entitled to the ...

Central Excise

March 27, 2017

Penalty u/s 11AC - Whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of payment of only 25% of the penalty? - The first Proviso not having been complied with, the appellant is not entitled to the benefit of the second Proviso - since demand was not deposited within 30 days, no relief from penalty - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 11AC - Whether the appellant was entitled to the ...

Central Excise

March 27, 2017

You may also like:

Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the benefit of reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax (ST) u/s 78(1) of the FA, 1994, assessee required to...

Whether penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 can be reduced to 25% by invoking the provisions of first proviso to Section 78, when the assessee has...

Waiver of penalty in excess of 25% - irregularity in availing Cenvat Credit - it is clear that the appellant had paid duty along with interest and 25% of penalty on...

Imposition of 100% penalty instead of 25% - if there is any short payment they would have been be asked to pay at that stage and the matter could have been come to an...

Penalty - Non deposit of amount of service tax collected from the client - benefit of payment of penalty of 25% extend to the appellant. - AT

Penalty u/r 25 or 26 of CER - Mentioning wrong rule number - The first appellate authority was not correct in holding that mentioning Rule 25 was a typographical error...

Entitlement to reduced penalty - total amount deposited at the time of investigation is much more than the confirmed duty demand, interest thereon and 25% penalty -...

Benefit of reduced penalty u/s 78 - the appellant had failed to deposit 25% of the imposed penalty before the issuance of show cause notice or within 30 days of...

Waiver of penalty or benefit of reduced penalty @25% - Appellant has shown reasonable cause for non payment of service tax and considering facts that the appellant has...

Benefit of the scheme under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 denied - delayed payment of just 25% of the amount - prima facie, we are of the considered opinion that...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Benefit of reduced penalty - When the legislature specifically fixes the time limit within which the duty with interest and penalty at 25% is to be paid for availing the...

Benefit of Amnesty scheme in respect of penalty only - HC rejects the following contention of the department that, inasmuch as there is a reference to a payment of tax...

Whether continued detention of goods can be justified - This period of 6 months can be enlarged by the Commissioner of Customs by a further period of 6 months, by virtue...

Imposition of penalty u/r 25 of CER - Second stage Dealer - Violation in respect of issuing Invoice - proper invoices were not issued and consequently, there is...

Quick Updates: