Home Highlights April 2012 Year 2012 This

You may also like:

1. Refund claim - Notification No.17/2009 - it is clear that receipt submitted by the courier agency does not content the details as required under the notification -...

2. Refund of claim - Claim filed beyond period of 1 year - Export - Notification No. 17/2009 - all conditions are mandatory - refund claim filed beyond one year rejected - AT

3. Refund of Service Tax - input services used for export of goods - service tax paid by MIAPL is under category which was not classified under Notification 17/2009-ST -...

4. Claim of refund - SEZ unit - Notification No. 09/2009-ST and 17/2011-ST - mere supply of surplus power in DTA as mentioned in Rule 47 of SEZ Rules, cannot be construed...

5. Denial of Refund claim – Availment of benefit of Notification No.41/07-ST & Notification no.17/09-ST – Computation of period of limitation for different periods and...

6. Refund of service tax - developer unit in SEZ - claim of refund prior to the exemption notifications no 9/2009-ST issued - refund allowed - AT

7. Refund of service tax on taxable services used for export of goods – assessee claimed refund of service tax on taxable services used for export of MT of Chrome...

8. Refund claim - SEZ unit - requirement of approval from the committee of SEZ - due to non approval of input services refund cannot be rejected under Notification No....

9. Denial of refund claim - Notification No.41/07-ST - services used for export purposes - Refund was denied to the Appellant mainly on various procedural grounds - refund...

10. Refund claim - reduction of price subsequent to clearance of the goods - Refund claim rejected - price variation clause itself is not a ground to consider the assessment...