Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2018 Year 2018 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - provision for leave encashment - dispute ...

Income Tax

March 27, 2018

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - provision for leave encashment - dispute was only relating to the year in which the said expenses are allowable and not about the very deductibility of the said expenses as the genuineness of the same was neither disputed nor doubted - no penalty - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Premium towards leave encashment - provision for leave encashment was held to be allowable if the same was based on a particular scheme proportionately with the...

  2. Provision for leave salary encashment and gratuity was made by the assessee on the basis of actuarial valuation done by actuary and these are considered as ascertained...

  3. Leave encashment - whether not an ascertained liability and thus liable to be added to the “book profit” under explanation 1 to Section 115 JB - MAT - Held no - HC

  4. Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) or penalty u/s.271AAA - The provisions of Section 271AAA(3) of the Act specifically excludes the provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the...

  5. Levy of penalty u/s 270A r.w.s. 274 - misreporting of income on the addition of leave encashment - levy of penalty is not automatic on mere making addition, if the...

  6. Disallowance of the provisions made for leave encashment - Post 01.04.2001, deduction of any sum on account of payment towards employees leave encashment would be...

  7. Disallowance of provision for gratuity and leave encashment - in case of trust, the meaning ‘applied’ need not be construed as ‘spent’. It includes the necessary...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Tribunal was required to consider post-amended provision of section 271 [1] of the Act. - HC

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Adopting “Doctrine of continuity“ and concurrence, the penalty in the assessee's case is liable to be confirmed only in the first assessment year - AT

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - it is clear that the departmental authorities are not sure as to which limb of the penalty provision is attracted - no penalty - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates