Penalty u/s 78 - suppression with intent to evade payment of ...

No Penalty Imposed for Service Tax Evasion u/s 78 Due to Prompt Payment and Lack of Intent.

April 24, 2018

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Penalty u/s 78 - suppression with intent to evade payment of service tax - appellant has immediately paid the amount of service tax alongwith interest - It shows that there was no positive act of suppression on the part of the appellant - no penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 78 - suppression with intent to evade payment of ...

No Penalty Imposed for Service Tax Evasion u/s 78 Due to Prompt Payment and Lack of Intent.

April 24, 2018

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - evasion of service tax - appellant collected service tax from the service receivers but failed to deposit the...

Services rendered by appellant classified as works contract services, attracting service tax liability. Appellant failed to obtain service tax registration and pay...

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - Tax paid on being pointed out - The conduct of the appellant of prompt payment of Service Tax immediately after gaining knowledge about its...

Penalties u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - Non-payment of Service Tax collected from clients due to the financial difficulties - The delay / non-payment of service tax cannot...

CESTAT ruled that service tax demands for rent-a-cab, tour operator, and business auxiliary services cannot be extended beyond normal limitation period due to absence of...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

CESTAT held that an Amway distributor is liable for service tax on commission received from sales group performance, categorizing it as Business Auxiliary Service. The...

Service tax exemption for services provided to UN agencies and educational institutions upheld. Demand regarding services rendered in J&K and SEZ units remanded for...

The case involved a challenge to a penalty imposed u/s 129 of the Goods and Service Tax Acts. The court held that without proof of intent to evade tax, such penalties...

Reduction of penalty u/s 78 of FA - non-payment of service tax - appellant has not recorded the said transactions in their specified records - Penalty reduced to 50% of...

The irregularity as found in EA audit vis a vis prompt payment of service tax and subsequent payment of penalty in conformity to Section 78 (B), the confirmation of...

The case pertains to the levy of service tax under the reverse charge mechanism (RCM) on rental payments made by a company to its directors for renting immovable...

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Quick Updates: