Once the department accepts the settlements and mandatory ...

Income Tax

November 27, 2018

Once the department accepts the settlements and mandatory requirement of affixing the stamps there is no reason to suspect the expenses incurred by the assessee towards stamp duty merely on the basis of surmises and conjunctures.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Once the department accepts the settlements and mandatory ...

Income Tax

November 27, 2018

You may also like:

Validity of SCN and audit notes issued - mandatory pre-show cause notice Consultation- A master circular issued by the department is binding upon its officers. The...

Grant registration/approval u/s 12AA/80G - independent reasons by ITAT in order - Tribunal was required either to accept the reasons and dismiss the appeal or not to...

Ordinarily the settlement comes as a package and composite tax statement is either to be accepted or rejected - Settlement tax cannot be accepted only in part - HC

Lower withholding certificate u/s 197 - requirement of reasoned order - the decision of the AO u/s 197(1) is quasi-judicial in nature, has to be taken on objective...

Validity of Settlement order u/s 245(C) - the 2nd respondent failed to include this property in the return of wealth on the relevant valuation dates. Thus, omission of...

Valuation of import goods - automobile parts - requirement of affixing of ‘retail selling price’ - Such goods when routed through channels for industrial/institutional...

Validity of Settlement Commission order u/s 245D(4) - Proof of true and full disclosure of income - While this Court does not accept the contention of the petitioner...

Waiver of pre-deposit - requirement u/s 129E - The case revolved around the appellant's failure to fulfill the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under section 129E of...

Requirement of mandatory pre-deposit under Section 129-E of Customs Act, 1962 - The mandatory provisions are required to be adhered to by the petitioner - the same...

Adjustment of refund against demand - requirement of prior intimation under section 245 of the Act was a mandatory requirement and failure to comply with this mandatory...

Challenge against the order passed by the Settlement Commission - reason behind the creation of Settlement Commission is to give a quietus to the dispute between the two...

Validity of reopening of assessment - An order u/s 245D(4) already been passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) - Scope of harmonious construction - The...

The petitioner having opted for settlement is not permitted to dissect Settlement Commission's Order to accept what is favourable and reject what is not.

Requirement to deposit Stamp Duty and Registration Fee - conversion of the petitioner from ‘Partnership Firm’ to ‘Limited Liability Partnership’ - Once there is no...

Validity of Settlement Commission orders - The case involved petitions seeking directives for the issuance of formal orders under section 245D (4) of the Income Tax Act,...

Quick Updates: