When the appellants themselves had informed the department ...

Central Excise

February 6, 2019

When the appellants themselves had informed the department regarding the omission to pay duty, the allegation of suppression is without any factual basis.

View Source

← Previous Next →

When the appellants themselves had informed the department ...

Central Excise

February 6, 2019

You may also like:

Tax liability - sub-contract - the main contractor has discharged the service tax liability and the same has been informed to the department by the appellant - demand...

Omission of sections 62 and 63 of Customs Act, 1962 - To omit the provisions regarding Control over warehoused goods and Payment of rent and warehouse charges

100% EOU - import of Fully Refined Paraffin Wax - The appellant has been cheated / duped by the supplier and the appellant immediately inform the Department regarding...

Remission of duty - the first information regarding such loss or destruction etc. to be sent within 24 hours of the occurrence. That they have failed to inform the...

In the absence of any provision in Central Excise regarding duty payment, the correct method would have been to pay entire Central Excise duty as determined under...

Refund of excise duty paid during investigation – voluntarily payment - the department has no right to retain any amount so long as there is no confirmed duty demand...

Extended period of limitation - Mere omission to give correct information is not a suppression of fact unless it was deliberate to stop the payment of duty - entire...

Refund claim alongwith interest - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - As from the facts itself, it is clear that the appellants were not required to pay any...

Penalty u/s. 271(l)(c) - Voluntary disclosure of income or not - revised return of income in which the assessee disclosed details of sale of immovable properties - It is...

Duty demand - Clubbing of turnover of the Job workers - dispute regarding Valuation - dummy units or not - If the department disputed the price at which excise duty paid...

Quick Updates: