Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - From the order of ITAT, there is a clear ...

Income Tax

July 17, 2020

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - From the order of ITAT, there is a clear finding that the assessee is liable to penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Hence, if the assessee was aggrieved, she should have challenged that portion of the order of the Tribunal, which held that the assessee should be liable to penalty.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - From the order of ITAT, there is a clear ...

Income Tax

July 17, 2020

You may also like:

Assessee neither challenged reopening nor has been able to disprove the finding of AO - penalty leviable u/s 271(1)(c) as assessee furnished inaccurate particulars and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - According to the assessee she was not having income exhibiting taxable limit in the past, but she has made small savings. When she filed the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Adopting “Doctrine of continuity“ and concurrence, the penalty in the assessee's case is liable to be confirmed only in the first assessment year - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - it is clear that the departmental authorities are not sure as to which limb of the penalty provision is attracted - no penalty - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Penalty u/s 271 - validity of assessment proceedings can be looked into during the penalty proceedings even though the assessment itself has not been challenged by the assessee.

Penalty under section 271(1) (c) - the cost of construction in the immovable property was found to be a false claim - where the claim of the assessee was found to be...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The finding of the authorities based on the evidence of the valuer, which was corroborated by the circumstantial evidence - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

Quick Updates: