Refund - respondent has deposited lumpsum amount during ...

Service Tax

September 21, 2020

Refund - respondent has deposited lumpsum amount during investigation and same was not recovered from the customers - Principles of Unjust Enrichment - Revenue failed to point out any evidence which may indicate that the burden was passed on by the respondent - Refund allowed by tribunal cannot be said to be perverse. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - respondent has deposited lumpsum amount during ...

Service Tax

September 21, 2020

You may also like:

Refund claim rejected – Unjust enrichment - the appellant’s have not recovered the amounts of duties from their customers so as to attract the unjust enrichment principles - AT

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - amount deposited during investigation - and amount of pre-deposit - Refund allowed - AT

Refund – unjust enrichment – Merely because the interest amount was not shown as recoverable amount from the customers, clause of unjust enrichment cannot be attracted - AT

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Unjust enrichment - during investigation appellant deposited an amount of Rs.18,75,000/- under protest by debit entries in the cenvat credit account - refund allowed - AT

Refund of service tax paid - unjust enrichment - Tribunal on merit of claim held that no service tax is payable - the adjudicating authority did sanction the refund but...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Refund of Service Tax paid - unjust enrichment - any amount deposited during the pendency of adjudication or investigation is in the nature of a deposit and, therefore,...

Denial of refund claim - unjust enrichment - There is no provision in the Central Excise law that the state government authorities would be are outside of the principles...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Security deposit - amount not to be credited to consumer welfare fund - appellants are eligible for refund of cash security...

Quick Updates: