Revision u/s 263 by CIT - PCIT failed to specify the transaction ...

Income Tax

October 28, 2021

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - PCIT failed to specify the transaction on which initiation of penalty either under section 271D or 271E was warranted. And on the issues of validity of discloser in IDS, the ld PCIT has not specified that while making declaration the assessee made any misrepresentation of any facts. Once the IDS in all cases were accepted by ld. PCIT, the AO or the Range head no authority to relook or power to revoke or to examine its validity. We further find that the ld PCIT while directing the AO has not himself revoked the IDS nor directed to refund the payment of tax to the assessee. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - PCIT failed to specify the transaction ...

Income Tax

October 28, 2021

You may also like:

Penalty u/s.271D & 271E - Period of limitation for imposing penalty u/s 275(1)(c) - he discussion by the AO in the assessment order and making reference to the Addl. CIT...

Benefit of Amnesty Scheme - Penalty levied u/s 271D and 271E - When a specified sum is so provided as the penalty, such specified sum is the minimum penalty payable....

Penalty u/s. 271E - violation of the provisions of Section 269T - Repayment of monthly instalment in cash to Tata Finance Corporation - as the assessee had not only...

Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

Penalty u/s 271E - contravention of the provisions of Section 269T in the preceding assessment year - no proceedings pending before the Ld. AO qua the assessee for A.Y....

Penalty u/s. 271G - assessee did not provide any basis for comparing the transactions and it failed to provide any alternative method to benchmark the transactions which...

Penalty u/s 271E - contravention of Section 269T - repayment by journal entries - penalty imposed u/s 271E deserves to be deleted - HC

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - mistake of non-initiation or incorrect initiation of penalty - the inherent indication u/s 271(1) makes it clear that the Pr. CIT / CIT does...

Penalty u/s 271E - repayment in cash - The purpose of introduction of the penal provisions in the legislature were to curb black money and benami transactions. The...

Levy of penalties u/s 271D and 271E for the violation of sections 269SS and 269T, respectively - The Tribunal, after reviewing precedents from the Supreme Court and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s 271B - non-furnishing of the Audit Report before the specified date - As the AO has failed in his duty in verifying whether books of account were audited...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - addition u/s 40A ignored by AO - expenses have been incurred in cash exceeding Rs. 20,000/- per day - AO is expected to examine the provisions...

Penalty u/s 271D read with section 269SS and Penalty u/s 271E read with section 269D - cash transaction - Merely on the regular balance interest paid the transaction...

Stay of demand / waiver of pre-deposit - Penalty u/s 271E - Allegation of cash transactions - whereas there were adjustments by way of book entries - When such being the...

Quick Updates: