Business expenditure u/s 37(1) - pharmaceutical companies’ g...
Supreme Court rules pharmaceutical freebies to doctors illegal, disallowing tax deductions u/s 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
https://www.taxtmi.com/hi...
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
ExpandCollapse
Income TaxFebruary 25, 2022Case LawsSC
Business expenditure u/s 37(1) - pharmaceutical companies’ gifting freebies to doctors, etc. - The incentives (or “freebies”) given by Apex, to the doctors, had a direct result of exposing the recipients to the odium of sanctions, leading to a ban on their practice of medicine. Those sanctions are mandated by law, as they are embodied in the code of conduct and ethics, which are normative, and have legally binding effect. The conceded participation of the assessee- i.e., the provider or donor- was plainly prohibited, as far as their receipt by the medical practitioners was concerned. That medical practitioners were forbidden from accepting such gifts, or “freebies” was no less a prohibition on the part of their giver, or donor, i.e., Apex. - Only its participation in what is plainly an action prohibited by law, precludes the assessee from claiming it as a deductible expenditure. - SC
Business expenditure u/s 37(1) - pharmaceutical companies’ gifting freebies to doctors, etc. - The incentives (or “freebies”) given by Apex, to the doctors, had a direct result of exposing the recipients to the odium of sanctions, leading to a ban on their practice of medicine. Those sanctions are mandated by law, as they are embodied in the code of conduct and ethics, which are normative, and have legally binding effect. The conceded participation of the assessee- i.e., the provider or donor- was plainly prohibited, as far as their receipt by the medical practitioners was concerned. That medical practitioners were forbidden from accepting such gifts, or “freebies” was no less a prohibition on the part of their giver, or donor, i.e., Apex. - Only its participation in what is plainly an action prohibited by law, precludes the assessee from claiming it as a deductible expenditure. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick
reference only.