Profiteering - Project Suncity Avenue-102 - The Authority ...

GST

June 24, 2022

Profiteering - Project Suncity Avenue-102 - The Authority determines that the Respondent has profiteered an amount of Rs. 2,62,56,652/-. Therefore, given the above facts, the Authority under Rule 133 (3) (a) of the CGST Rules orders that the Respondent shall reduce the price to be realized from the buyers of the flats commensurate with the benefit of ITC received by him. - However, the penalty under Section 171 (3A) cannot be imposed on the Respondent retrospectively. - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - Project Suncity Avenue-102 - The Authority ...

GST

June 24, 2022

You may also like:

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - The Authority finds no reason to differ from the detailed computation of profiteered amount by the DGAP or the methodology adopted by...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - Respondent directed to refund / repay both the profiteered amount @2.61% of the taxable amount (base price) and the GST on the said...

Profiteering - purchase of flats - benefit of Input Tax Credit had not been passed on to the Applicant - The Authority determined amount of Rs. 85,77,419/- (including...

Profiteering - purchase of flats - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the commensurate benefit of ITC to him - post-GST, the Respondent has been...

Profiteering - The instant case does not fall under the ambit of Anti-Profiteering provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 as the Respondent is not executing any...

Profiteering - four towers/blocks of the project Celebrity Gardens - The Authority finds and determines that the Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs....

Profiteering - purchased a flat in the Respondent's project - allegation is that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - The Authority takes cognizance, based on the DGAP’s verification, that the Respondent No. 2 has passed on benefit as per Table-N above...

Profiteering - Construction Service supplied by the Respondent - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate...

Profiteering - Failure to reduce Maximum Retail Prices (MRPs) - Petition against the decision of NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY - HUL directed to pre-deposit...

Quick Updates: