Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - depreciation on account of the increase ...

Income Tax

April 28, 2023

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - depreciation on account of the increase in the cost of machinery due to foreign currency fluctuation losses - At worst, in the instant case, the petitioner’s action could be construed as one where it sought to make a claim which was unsustainable in law. That by itself, in the given circumstance, would not call for imposition of penalty, as once the error was pointed out by the AO, the respondent/assessee made a course correction before the assessment order was passed. - No penalty - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - depreciation on account of the increase ...

Income Tax

April 28, 2023

You may also like:

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – the penalty imposed for disallowing claim of expenditure on foreign education and foreign travelling cannot be upheld - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - claim of depreciation @100% instead of 15% - Temporary Wooden structures like interiors, glow signs etc. being Furniture & Fixture - Levy of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Held that:- Wrongful claim of depreciation - The attempts made by the assessee are indicative of frivolous nature of claim - penalty confirmed - AT

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - absence of due care does not mean that the assessee is guilty of either furnishing inaccurate particulars or attempting to conceal its income -...

Claim towards exchange fluctuation loss - for the purpose of depreciation, the cost of asset cannot be reduced or increased due to exchange rate fluctuation - allowed as...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c)- additions u/s 68 - the contention of the assessee cannot be straightway rejected that such error may occur due to software problem - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The absence of due care does not mean that the assessee was guilty of furnishing inaccurate particulars to conceal his income - HC

Quick Updates: