Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - period of limitation of ...

Court Rules Section 264 Time Limit Directory, Allows CIT to Decide on Applications After One-Year Period Lapses.

March 2, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - period of limitation of one year is mandatory or directory - the provisions are directory only - CIT directed to decided the application even after lapse of one year - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - period of limitation of ...

Court Rules Section 264 Time Limit Directory, Allows CIT to Decide on Applications After One-Year Period Lapses.

March 2, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

CENVAT Credit - time limitation - entitlement for Credit beyond six month - since the time limit has been extended from six months to one year by substitution in the...

The assessee's request for fixation of special rate of brand-rate drawback was rejected due to non-fulfilment of basic requirements and time limitation. The assessee...

HC ruled that time limits under Section 144C(13) for completing assessments following DRP directions are mandatory, not directory. The AO must pass orders within one...

The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

Transitional Input tax credit - availment of accumulated CENVAT by filing declaration Form TRAN-1 beyond the period provided under CGST Rules - Rule 117 is directory in...

Arbitral Proceedings - Computation of one-year period for completing the proceedings - exclusion of days during which the proceedings were stayed - The High Court...

HC held that assessment orders for tax years 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 were time-barred under Rule 14A (5A), which mandates assessments must be completed within four years...

Refund claim - time limitation - excess payment of service tax - rejection of refund claim as barred by limitation of time on the ground of delay in filing such...

The MHA issued a public notice establishing new guidelines for processing prior permission applications under FCRA, 2010. The directive stipulates a 3-year validity...

The appellant, engaged in manufacturing soda ash, availed CENVAT credit amounting to Rs. 46,27,417/- for the period 03.12.2005 to 31.03.2012 on input services utilized...

The appellant's Daman unit mistakenly paid duty liability of their Halol unit due to an error in the ERP system meant for all group units. The issue pertains to...

Renewal of recognition for "Metropolitan Stock Exchange of India Limited" one year

HC upheld rejection of rectification application filed under Section 35C(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Following precedent set in Hongo India Pvt Ltd case, court...

HC found the refund claim for unutilized input tax credit time-barred u/s 54. The court interpreted Section 54(1) and 54(3) to establish that while refund claims can be...

Initiation of CIRP - Application barred by time limitation or not - The acknowledgement made by the Principal Borrower within three years’ period from the date of...

Quick Updates: