Frivolous additions by the Revenue - the Revenue has failed to ...

Court Imposes Rs. 25,000 Fine on Revenue for Frivolous Additions and Misidentifying Sale Proceeds as Taxable Income.

August 23, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Frivolous additions by the Revenue - the Revenue has failed to understand the fundamental difference between sale consideration on one hand and income chargeable to tax on the other. The Revenue despite being assisted by thousands of experts in the field of finance and taxation, has committed such elementary mistake leading to harassment to the assessee who has been compelled to file the present avoidable piece of litigation. More so, this Court has been compelled to decide this frivolous matter wasting its precious time and energy which could have been utilized in more pressing matters. - Cost of Rs. 25000 imposed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Frivolous additions by the Revenue - the Revenue has failed to ...

Court Imposes Rs. 25,000 Fine on Revenue for Frivolous Additions and Misidentifying Sale Proceeds as Taxable Income.

August 23, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The case pertains to the imposition of a fine and penalty for the rejection of the declared value and redetermination of the value u/r 12 of the Customs Valuation...

The ITAT upheld the Assessing Officer's determination that the actual sale consideration for the immovable property was Rs. 5,04,80,000/-, rejecting the assessee's...

Dishonor of Cheque - he trial court is empowered to direct payment of compensation, double that amount. Rs. 7,02,500/- is the fine imposed in the case on hand and the...

The High Court set aside the impugned assessment orders imposing a 100% penalty u/s 74 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, for excess claims of Input Tax...

The High Court considered a case involving the release of seized goods u/s 110A. The issue was the non-issuance of a show cause notice within the stipulated time due to...

ITAT modified multiple additions in a tax appeal concerning bogus purchases and unexplained money. For contested purchases of Rs. 13,80,63,994, ITAT directed application...

SC upheld the Tribunal's compensation award in a motor accident death claim, restoring Rs. 58,24,000/- for father and Rs. 93,61,000/- for mother against claimed amounts...

Release of goods - insecticides, pesticides and other agrochemicals including technical such as “Cyantraniliprole Technical” - Import through Port which is not a...

Provisional release of detained goods - The department's insistence on a 100% bank guarantee of Rs. 25,00,000/- was deemed arbitrary and onerous, especially considering...

HC found the writ petition maintainable, quashing the sale certificate and declaring it null and void. The court ordered respondent No. 1 to refund Rs. 9,93,752.94 with...

The CESTAT upheld the duty demand, confiscation of imported goods for non-fulfilment of export obligation u/s 111(o), imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and...

In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

In a case involving the imposition of a redemption fine and penalty, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that when goods are allowed...

The Appellate Tribunal held that for determining the holding period of a property or calculating long-term capital gains, the date of allotment of the property is...

The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal...

Quick Updates: