Revision u/s 263 - The use of the word `and’ between the two ...

Income Tax

November 22, 2023

Revision u/s 263 - The use of the word `and’ between the two expressions amply demonstrates that the calling for and examining the record by the CIT should precede and his such examination should culminate in getting satisfied that the order passed by the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - The use of the word `and’ between the two ...

Income Tax

November 22, 2023

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - Applicability of provisions of 56(2)(vii)(b) - Documentary evidence available in the records which the AO admits to have verified the veracity thereof...

Classification of goods - Benefit of exemption - the expression “other than” appearing after the words “gaseous hydro carbons” and before the words “natural gas” would...

Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - second revisional jurisdiction of Pr. CIT - Whether the AO (called second AO) has not conducted enquiry while framing re-assessment...

Revision u/s 263 - The words “as he deems necessary”, in our view, do not mean that the Ld. PCIT was left with a choice either to make or not to make an enquiry. As per...

Revision u/s 263 - Invocation of revision proceedings for the second time - As pertinent to point out that there was no bar on limitation by the ld. PCIT to invoke...

Revision u/s 263 - Error in computing capital WIP - vis a vis the issue of accounting for income by the assessee whether in accordance with the Guidelines of the ICAI,...

Revision u/s 263 - The word ‘may’ used in Section 263 should be presumed to be shall or otherwise interpreting the word “may” as not mandatory, orders can be passed even...

If in a Statutory Rule or Statutory Notification, there are two expressions used, one in General Terms and the other in special words, under the rules of interpretation,...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - Since the aforesaid exercise was carried out by the second AO in the reassessment...

Revision u/s 263 - Use of word "seems" by the CIT while recording reasons - It seems that, Assessment order passed by the A.O. in this case is erroneous and prejudicial...

Quick Updates: