Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  2. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  3. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  4. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  5. Text Search
  6. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  7. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  8. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
    Rejection of Third-Party Info Disclosure Under IT Act Section 138(1)(b) Upheld in Criminal Case Context
    Bad Debt Claim Allowed Under Section 36(1)(vii) When Write-Off Is Real and Identifiable
    Refund of unutilized input tax credit on compensation cess allowed under relevant circulars and Patson Papers precedent
    Section 73/74 GST Proceedings Cannot Be Based Solely on Turnover Discrepancy Without Fraud or Suppression Evidence
    No Recovery Allowed on Excess Customs Duty Refund Under Section 18(5) of Customs Act, 1962
    SC confirms fixed place PE under Article 5(1) of India-UAE DTAA based on coordinated business activities and control
    Reopening of Income Tax Assessment Valid Under Sections 147/148 for Undisclosed Share Capital from Paper Companies
    Penalty under Section 271AAB(1A) quashed for defective notice and inconsistent AO stance across assessment years
    Penalty under Section 270A not imposed for delayed return if no concealment or income misreporting found
    Assessment case transfer invalid without formal order or hearing under Section 127; jurisdiction assumed improperly quashed
    Revenue from tradable license sales not deductible under Section 80IB(11A) without reducing production costs
    ITAT Rules Section 69 and 68 Additions Invalid Without Proper Evidence, Allows Capital Loss on Debenture Redemption
    Deduction under Section 80IB(10) denied; res judicata not applicable across different assessment years
    ITAT Orders 10% Surcharge on Income Tax for Association of Persons Under Finance Act Slabs
    ITAT Upholds Exclusion of Non-Comparable Companies in Transfer Pricing Under Section 92C
    CoC Can Approve Revised Resolution Plans After Voting Starts Under Clause 2.8.5(d) of RFRP
    Recovery Proceedings Quashed for Compliance with Section 107(6) CGST Act and Circular No. 224/18/2024 GST
    Assessment order against non-existent partnership firm converted to LLP is void ab initio under relevant tax rules
    Unsigned assessment orders under Income Tax law are invalid and cannot be ratified by later signing
    Margin Money Deposited for Bank Guarantees Not Refundable After Invocation Under Insolvency Rules

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for : Law : All
Reset Filters
Showing
Records
ExpandCollapse
    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for : Law : AllReset Filters
    Case ID :

    The court held that the petitioner was denied the principles of...

    Taxpayer denied natural justice; GST reconciliation errors reconsidered after proof of payment.

    📋
    Contents
    Note

    Note

    Note

    Bookmark

    print

    Print

    GSTSeptember 14, 2024Case LawsHC

    The court held that the petitioner was denied the principles of natural justice by not being given a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits regarding the difference between GSTR 3B and GSTR 1, and the RCM liability mismatch. The petitioner provided proof of payment for the GSTR 3B and GSTR 1 difference, and substantiated the RCM liability mismatch as an inadvertent error through GSTR 3B returns, securing the revenue interest. The impugned order relating to RCM liability mismatch was set aside, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration by the respondent authority. The petitioner was directed to submit a reply to the show cause notice within 15 days. The petition was disposed of.

    Topics

    ActsIncome Tax