Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
    Income Tax Exemption Under Section 10(46A) for Pollution Control Boards from AY 2025-26 Onwards
    Regulator Bans Transaction Charges to Mutual Fund Distributors for Investments Above Minimum Amount
    Revised rules ease sponsor lock-in and disclosure for private to public InvIT conversions under new framework
    Criminal Proceedings for Unpaid Sale Consideration Don't Amount to Criminal Breach of Trust Under Section 406 IPC
    Penalty upheld under Section 129(1)(b) GST for transit without e-way bill; modified to Section 129(1)(a) due to documents present
    AO exceeded jurisdiction by disallowing depreciation on purchased goodwill without proper approval under ITAT ruling
    ITAT Upholds Bad Debt Recoveries Deductibility Under Sec 41(1) and Depreciation Rules Under Sec 32
    Writ Petition Dismissed for Challenging Assessment Order Under Sections 147 and 144 Due to Alternative Remedies
    High Court sets aside rejection of settlement under Section 245C for non-disclosure, orders fresh consideration
    Long-Term Capital Gains Based on Sale Deed Value; Bonus Shares Not Taxed Under Section 56(2)(vii)(c); Section 54F Deduction Allowed for One Property O...
    Assessee Not Liable for Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia) for Non-Deduction of TDS Under Section 195
    Additions under Section 68 for bogus gains dismissed due to lack of direct evidence and no cross-examination opportunity
    Deduction Allowed Under Section 80JJAA Despite Filing Form 10DA with Revised Return Procedural Lapse Not Fatal
    Penalty under Section 271D and 274 upheld for concealed cash sale consideration within limitation period
    Cancellation of GST Registration Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Rule 22(4) of CGST Rules, 2017
    Prior Period and Extraordinary Items Included in Net Profit for MAT Under Section 115JB, No Extra Adjustment Needed
    AO's 30% addition under Section 68 reduced to 15% due to lack of evidence and proper analysis of financials
    ITAT Orders Registration Under Section 12AB, Rejects CIT(E)'s Denial Based on Community Reference
    SC upholds NCLAT ruling: Corporate Debtor retains possession; possession disputes to civil court under CIRP rules
    Differential Service Tax Demands Set Aside; Exemptions and Valid CENVAT Credit Upheld Under Sections 66D and 73(1)

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for : Law : All
Reset Filters
Showing
Records
ExpandCollapse

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for : Law : AllReset Filters
    Case ID :

    CESTAT set aside penalties imposed u/ss 112(a)(i) and 114AA of...

    CESTAT Cancels Customs Penalties in Cigarette Smuggling Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Denied Cross-examination Rights u/s 138B.

    📋
    Contents
    Note

    Note

    Note

    Bookmark

    print

    Print

    CustomsJanuary 27, 2025Case LawsAT

    CESTAT set aside penalties imposed u/ss 112(a)(i) and 114AA of Customs Act in a case involving smuggled cigarettes concealed as ladies garments. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence linking the appellant to smuggling operations. Bank transactions between appellant's company and co-accused's firms were deemed regular business dealings. The primary evidence, a statement by co-accused VA, was ruled inadmissible as appellant was denied cross-examination rights u/s 138B. The Tribunal emphasized that no documentation proved appellant's prior knowledge of concealment or use of false declarations. Following natural justice principles and citing lack of corroborative evidence, CESTAT concluded penalties were legally unsustainable and allowed the appeal.

    Topics

    ActsIncome Tax